The human hepatitis E virus
The family Hepeviridae consists of a not yet fully classified group of viruses in vertebrates, including fish, birds, and mammals. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) belongs to the genus Hepevirus, which includes four genotypes capable of infecting human beings. In a recent review, a novel classification of the family into two genera was proposed, with the avian and mammal viruses drawing a single genus and the viruses from fish a second one.1 HEV strains found among humans belong to a single viral species within the first genus consisting of six separate genotypes. This species was nominated as human HEV (HHEV). Genotypes 1 and 2 (HHEV1, HHEV2) are exclusive of human beings, and genotypes 3 and 4 (HHEV3, HHEV4) are shared by humans with other mammals. In addition, some HEV strains found in wild boar drew two additional genotypes of HHEV, and HEV strains specific for birds, bat, rodent, and ferret would constitute, respectively, four distinct species within the genus.
The HHEV virion is a spherical-shaped particle, approximately 30nm in diameter, consisting of a single structural protein (the core protein) that arranges in different ways into distinct structural units. The viral genome consists of a linear, single stranded, positive sensed, 3′-capped single RNA species, 7.3 kilobases in length organized into three open reading frames (ORFs).2 Four functional proteins involved in viral replication are encoded by ORF1. ORF2 and ORF3 sequences specify the virion core protein and a small phosphoprotein of unknown function, respectively (Fig. 1).
Main epidemiological and clinical features of HHEV
Though HHEV is thought to constitute a single serotype, no experimental evidence of cross-protective immunity among the different HHEV genotypes infecting humans exists, and these genotypes draw two separate groups in regard to their epidemiological features (Table 1). HHEV1 and 2 are exclusive to humans, restricted to particular geographical areas, and spread often among the children as waterborne, open epidemic outbreaks. In contrast, HHEV3 and 4 are adapted to mammals from different orders, distributed worldwide, and infect humans sporadically through zoonotic transmission or by consumption of contaminated aliments. Pig, wild boar, deer, moufflon, cattle, rat, rabbit, and mongoose are known potential reservoirs of HHEV either in farms or in the wild.
Table 1Main epidemiological features of the four HHEV genotypes infecting humans
Feature | HHEV1 | HHEV2 | HHEV3 | HHEV4 |
---|
Regional distribution | Tropical regions | Africaa | Worldwide | East Asia, Europe |
Epidemics | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Waterborne | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Spread among children | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Known animal reservoirs | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Foodborne | ? | ? | Yes | Yes |
Diseases caused by these HHEV genotypes share identical clinical features among themselves and other acute viral hepatitis. Asymptomatic infection seems a common event as well. Though HHEV1 infection has a high fatality rate (20–25%) among pregnant women, the disease can in any other cases be mistaken as hepatitis A by clinicians in the regions where this agent remains endemic. In addition to jaundice, anorexia, abdominal pain, and hepatomegaly are often found among patients with acute hepatitis due to HHEV1, other symptoms like fever, nausea, or vomiting are less frequent. The case fatality rate ranges from 0.5 to 4% among patients requiring hospitalization, most likely a small minority overall. To date, persistent viral infection by HHEV1 has not been reported.
Detailed clinical data from patients with acute hepatitis due to HHEV3 are rare. When a comparison was performed, most cases reported resembled cases of acute hepatitis A.3 Among 33 individuals involved in an outbreak of HHEV3 infection on a cruise ship, 11 suffered acute hepatitis, and 22 had asymptomatic infection.4 Jaundice was observed in seven cases, and abnormal liver enzyme levels were detected only among the patients displaying acute disease. The likelihood of infection was significantly higher among men than women. Complications of the HHEV3 infection are not frequent, and mortality was often associated with underlying alcoholic cirrhosis. Virus persistency resulting in chronic hepatitis has been reported among patients with immune impairment, including transplant recipients, hematological patients, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients.5
HHEV is the main cause of acute viral hepatitis in developing countries. HHEV1 infection has led to epidemic outbreaks and sporadic cases in Southern and Central Asia, the Far East, Africa, and the Caribbean. Most patients involved were children. HHEV2 has been responsible for outbreaks in the African continent. Sporadic cases of acute hepatitis due to HHEV3 or 4 are regularly recorded in Europe and in the Americas, as well as in China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. In the USA, a study performed at the national level among 154 patients with acute hepatitis found a frequency of locally acquired hepatitis E of 9.7%, where all cases tested positive for HHEV3 infection.6 Autochthonous cases due to this genotype have also been found in other American countries like Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, and Uruguay, the frequency ranging from 1.6 to 30% in the series.7 HHEV3 and 4 do not cause open epidemics but may be involved in small outbreaks.
The prevalence of specific antibody to HHEV (anti-HHEV) may display wide regional and population-based variations.8 The greatest regional differences occur among children, and data show that the virus spreads earlier in life in Asian populations relative to regions where HHEV1 is absent. Generally speaking, HHEV1 shares with HAV many epidemiological similarities, but is less prevalent among the population of endemic regions because of the decrease in viral particle stability. Clusters of high endemicity have, however, been reported for specific populations from China and South-Eastern Asia. HHEV3 is prevalent everywhere, but unexplained regional differences in prevalence have been found within the USA.9 Regarding HHEV2 and 4, there is little data available and insufficient to draw an epidemiological picture.
Laboratory diagnosis of hepatitis E
Laboratory assays for specific antibody testing have been developed with recombinant antigens from the antigenic viral proteins, mainly the core protein. Early serological diagnosis is based on detection of the anti-HHEV IgM response by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) testing. Like in other viral infections, samples reactive in EIA can be re-tested by recombinant immunoblottest (RIBT) for confirmatory purposes. The data available support the reasonable robustness of the current assays for anti-HHEV IgM testing in the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E, and confirmed reactivity for anti-HHEV IgM is sufficient for diagnosis. Because primary infection by human cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus may cause transient, false-positive results for anti-HHEV IgM by RIBT, specific testing for acute primary infection of these viruses is suitable when molecular diagnosis is not performed or viremia is not detected.10 Seroconversion to anti-HHEV IgG antibody on follow-up provides a late, additional confirmation, and is the only diagnostic criterion fulfilled in exceptional cases.
Molecular diagnosis is based on amplification of selected sequences from the ORF1 region of the viral genome. The antibody detection window extends for about two weeks, and viremia persists at detectable levels for a variable period of time. Viremia levels are lower than in other forms of acute viral hepatitis, and target degradation during storage impairs the retrospective diagnosis of the disease. Testing of stool samples may help when viremia is not detected. Commercial tests for HHEV genome detection have limited availability in the market.
Therefore, diagnostic criteria for acute hepatitis E in serum samples are as follows: 1. IgM negative, RNA positive (window period); 2. IgM positive, RNA positive (early seroconversion stage); 3. IgM positive, RNA negative (post-seroconversion stage); and 4. Seroconversion to IgG antibody on follow-up (Fig. 2).